REPORT ON
INTERIM FINAL CERTIFICATION
in MBOU NSOSH No. 30
The charter of the school provides for an intermediate final assessment of students in grades 2-8 as one of the components of the system for determining the quality of education at school, the most important form of control over the level of development of educational programs.
Guided by the Regulations on
intermediate certification and transfer of students, the teaching staff carried out the following activities:
· Meetings of the MS and the teachers' council were held on the organized completion of the academic year, the preparation and conduct of the intermediate final certification;
· The work of subject teachers, class teachers of grades 2-8 was carried out to implement the right of students to choose exams, their forms for intermediate certification;
· Compiled and approved measuring instruments for written examinations;
the terms and procedure for conducting written examinations have been determined;
examination of the examination material;
Evaluation criteria developed examination papers on various levels of complexity;
Developed and communicated to participants educational process schedule of intermediate certification;
analysis of examination papers;
· Analysis of the results of the interim certification.
Intermediate attestation at the school was held from May 22 to May 28. No violations of the procedure were noted. During the certification, all the provisions of the administrative documents for the school were observed:
"On the procedure for the end of the academic year and the timing of intermediate certification in grades 2-8."
"On the approval of the schedule of transfer exams, the form of final certification and the composition of the examination committees in grades 2-8 in the academic year."
"On the transfer of students in grades 2-8, 10 based on the results of intermediate certification."
Pedagogical Council No. 7 dated 13.g. it was decided:
To admit to the intermediate final certification of all students in grades 2-8;
In accordance with clause 3.4 of the Regulations ongrading system, forms, order, frequency
intermediate certification and transfer of students (intermediate certification of students who are absent for more than 50% of the study time for good reason(sports competitions, training camps, etc.) is carried out with the obligatory delivery to the teacher educational material studied in a quarter (half year) at the choice of any of the forms of intermediate certification) to a 8th grade student Sergey Semenko to assign the passing of tests, control and test work on topics missed during the 4th quarter in subjects - Russian, algebra, geometry, English, physics, computer science, chemistry, biology;
Exempt from the intermediate (annual) attestation on the basis of medical certificates of a 3rd grade student Nikita Velichko, who is being treated;
To exempt from intermediate (annual) certification of students with excellent annual marks in all subjects: Pigunova Ksenia, Gridyakina Victoria, Reutskaya Kristina,
Savchenko Ekaterina, Tsokolova Irina, Moroz Xenia;
For the intermediate final certification of students in grades 2-8, at the suggestion of the MS of the school, the following exams were taken:
2-4 grades - mathematics
Grade 8 - algebra and life safety.
A positive moment of the interim assessment in 2012 was the fact that, compared with the annual assessments, the results are stable in terms of UO (%) - in all subjects submitted for the interim assessment. Positive dynamics of CR (%) is observed in subjects: mathematics grade 4 - by 20%, life safety grade 8 - by 6%. Negative dynamics is noted in the 8th grade in algebra, respectively - by 17%, in computer science in grade 5 - by 15%, in mathematics in grade 2 - by 20%, which indicates that students in the process of intermediate certification did not confirm the results of the year. Yearly grades were confirmed by 6th grade students in Russian language and geography, and 7th grade students in physics.
Main conclusions based on qualitative analysis exams held as part of the intermediate certification:
1. The control work in mathematics in grade 2 consisted of 5 tasks aimed at testing the assimilation of tabular cases of addition and the corresponding cases of subtraction, the ability to compare multi-digit numbers, the ability to operate with mathematical terminology, the ability to solve problems, to master the key phrases “increase by”, “increase in", "decrease by". All students completed the given text. Mistakes of a computational nature were made, as well as when performing a task to increase (decrease by) a segment several times. KO (%) - 60%, UO (%) - 100%.
2. Analysis of the control work in grade 3 showed that all students confirmed their annual grades. Exam control work checked the possession of computational methods of multiplication and division, addition and subtraction of multi-digit numbers, the ability to find the area and perimeter of a rectangle, the ability to solve problems. Students mostly made computational errors when finding the value of the expression and in the written subtraction algorithm.
3. In 4 in mathematics, all students have learned the mandatory minimum content of education. Knowledge control was carried out in two stages: stage 1 - tested the ability to solve equations, compare values, find the value of an expression with multi-digit numbers; Stage 2 - tested the ability to solve problems for movement, for finding the area and perimeter of a rectangle, problems with quantities. Students made computational errors when solving equations and comparing quantities. Students did not make any serious mistakes while solving problems. KO (%) of the exam was 90%, MA (%) - 100%.
4. In the 5th grade in computer science, students did the best with the task "information carriers" and "drawing in Paint". The students found it difficult to format the document.
5. In the 6th grade in the Russian language, all students mastered the program in accordance with the state standard general education and confirmed their annual estimates. The topics "Syntax" and "Punctuation" are well mastered. When writing a test, students most often made mistakes in writing the unstressed vowel being checked at the root of the word (3 people), in the phonetic analysis of words (3 people), in the morphemic composition of the verb and its special forms and morphological analysis of words (4 people), syntactic analysis of the sentence (3 people).
6. In the 6th grade in geography, 5 students confirmed their annual grades (), wrote papers below the annual grade and Mistakes were made in geographical terms, when solving problems and when working with a map.
7. The analysis of the physics exam in the 7th grade showed that the students had mastered the following topics well: “Introduction”, “Movement and interaction of bodies”, “Sound phenomena”, “ Mechanical vibrations". The lowest number of points in the test part of the exam, students scored on the topic "Light phenomena". The students showed on the exam knowledge of the formulas of a rectilinear uniform motion, density of matter, forces of friction and gravity, mechanical work and power, the ability to move from non-system units of measurement to system ones, to solve calculation problems for the indirect application of the formula. The greatest difficulties for students were caused by: the task of applying Hooke's law (to determine the stiffness of the spring and the elongation of the spring), the task of finding the distance to the obstacle (reflection of sound), the task of finding the optical power of the lens, the task of constructing the path of the beam in a diverging lens. During the practical part of the exam, it was revealed: 3 out of 14 students are not able to determine the division value of the device and the measurement error, 2 students were not able to independently draw a conclusion from the experiments.
8. The physical education exam in grade 7 was held in two stages: at the first stage, students
showed their theoretical knowledge in the field of physical culture and sports. The answers of Kirnos Stanislav and Kozhnikov Fedor were especially distinguished. The guys not only showed good theoretical knowledge, but also expressed their understanding of the importance of sports and healthy lifestyle life in the life of every person. In the second stage, students performed practical tasks: jumping, running, pulling up. The best were Andrey Bedrik, Ilya Soroka, Stanislav Kirnos, who confidently confirmed their annual grades as "excellent". KO (%) on the exam - 86%, UO (%) - 100%.
9. In the 8th grade, there is a low level of quality of mathematical preparation both according to the results of the year and according to the results of the intermediate certification among 44% of the eighth graders who will take part in the state final certification (GIA - 2013). Students make mistakes in the algorithm for solving the inequality, which reduces to a linear one, in writing the answer as a numerical interval. 55% of eighth graders did not start solving the problem.
Recommendations: during the school year, systematically conduct classes with low-performing students to repeat the program material on the following topics - " quadratic function. Its properties and graph”, “Inequalities. Solution of linear and square inequalities”, “Problem solving using equations”.
10. The exam in the 8th grade on life safety showed that students have mastered the mandatory minimum of education in the subject. Topics well understood: “Rules of conduct during accidents at chemical facilities”, “Rules of conduct in case of accidents at radiation facilities”, “Personal protective equipment”, “First aid in case of skin contact chemical substances". Mistakes were made in questions: sources of pollution of water, atmosphere, soil, do not know the causes and stages of development of technical accidents, confuse the procedure for evacuation in case of an accident at hydroelectric power plants.
The educational and material base of the school allows for an organized, modern level of educational work with students. However, the success rate for individual classes remains insufficiently high. This is explained by the fact that in these classes children with a low level of opportunities study, there are students with "3" in one subject. This fact indicates insufficiently close contacts between class teachers and subject teachers, the need to apply individual approach in the assessment of the ZUN of students and more rational use extra hours for individual work with promising students.
Annual analysis of progress in subjects:
academic year
Items | 1 quarter | 2 quarter | 3 quarter | 4 quarter | Per year |
||||||
KO,% | UO,% | KO,% | UO,% | KO,% | UO,% | KO,% | UO,% | KO,% | UO,% |
||
Russian language | 49,1 | 51,7 | 42,2 | ||||||||
Literature | 70,5 | 67,2 | |||||||||
Mathematics | |||||||||||
Algebra | 51,2 | 92,6 | 56,5 | 61,4 | 55,3 | 55,3 | |||||
Geometry | 56,5 | 52,3 | |||||||||
Geography | 54,7 | ||||||||||
Informatics | 89,4 | 86,6 | |||||||||
Physics | 56,5 | 52,3 | |||||||||
MHC | |||||||||||
Chemistry | 51,7 | 53,1 | |||||||||
Biology | 61,4 | 66,6 | |||||||||
life safety fundamentals | 83,3 | 77,6 | |||||||||
Story | 56,1 | 68,3 | |||||||||
Social science | 73,5 | ||||||||||
German | 71,4 | 71,4 | |||||||||
English language | 69,2 | 62,2 | 62,5 | 67,5 | |||||||
Technology | |||||||||||
Music | |||||||||||
iso | 93,3 | 95,5 | 93,5 | 93,5 |
Findings:
1. Intermediate final examination generally showed stable results in teaching students in grades 2-8.
2. Intermediate final certification was carried out in an organized manner in accordance with the approved schedule. No violations of discipline were noted.
1. Administration to hold a meeting pedagogical council schools where to analyze the results of the interim (annual) certification.
2. subject methodical associations to study and use in the work the normative documents regulating the requirements for the level of preparation of students in the subjects of the curriculum.
3. Subject school MOs to analyze the results of the interim (annual) certification and, at the August meetings, take into account the results of the certification when planning work for the academic year, and outline ways of correction.
4. Subject teachers to use forms and methods of optimization and activation of cognitive activity in the organization of individual preparatory work with students in preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification.
5. The school administration and the heads of subject CMEs, when accumulating a bank of meters, draw up individual tasks for students with a low level of abilities.
6. School administrations and heads of subject MOs, when accumulating a bank of meters, should use test materials more widely, in preparation for the Unified State Examination, GIA, as well as new form assessment systems within the framework of the GEF IEO.
Deputy director for water resources management: ______________
REFERENCE
based on the results of the intermediate (annual) certification of students in grades 1-8
2014 – 2015 academic year
In accordance with the order for the school dated April 16, 2015 No. 20, from May 13 to May 26, 2015, intermediate certification of students in grades 2, 3, 5-8 was carried out.
Target:
Determining the actual level of knowledge of schoolchildren in individual subjects, identifying the effectiveness and degree of schoolchildren's learning.
During the intermediate assessment of students, the school was guided by the Regulations on the intermediate (annual) assessment of students, the decision of the Pedagogical Council dated February 16, 2015 (protocol No. 1), where the subjects and forms of the intermediate assessment were approved.
By decision of the Pedagogical Council, the intermediate (annual) certification included a knowledge test on:
Russian language (2, 5 cells);
German(6 cells)
mathematics (2, 5, 8 cells);
biology (7th grade);
complex control work (3 cl.)
social science (7th grade);
literature (6th grade);
geography (8th grade);
checking the reading technique of students (grades 4-8).
Diagnostic materials for intermediate certification in grades 2-3 were developed by teachers primary school, in grades 5-8 - subject teachers. KIMs were considered and approved at a meeting of the methodological council of the school (minutes No. 2 of 04/20/2015). Intermediate certification in grade 2 was carried out in the form of tests, in grade 3 - in the form of a comprehensive test, in grades 5-8 - in the form of diagnostic tests. Two weeks before it began, a schedule was drawn up. Students and parents were familiarized with the schedule and procedure for holding class and parent meetings.
Number of classes
Number of students
at the end of the year
Number of students admitted to intermediate certification
37 students of grades 2-3, 5-8 passed intermediate certification.
21 people (57% of those certified) graduated from the academic year with "4" and "5", which is 4% higher than in the last academic year; on "excellent" of them - 7 students.
Four students were awarded the Certificate of Appreciation "For excellent academic achievement".
The results of the intermediate (annual) certification in subjects
teacher
Class
thing
quantity
study
performed
work
Grade
quality of knowledge
training
2nd grade teacher
Russian language
1
33%
-
mathematics
1
33%
-
teacher
Russian language
2
33%
2
33%
3
50%
1
17%
teacher
mathematics
1
17%
3
50%
teacher
literature
2
33%
2
33%
teacher
German
1
17%
2
33%
teacher
biology
1
14%
5
71%
teacher
social science
4
57%
1
14%
teacher
geography
2
29%
2
29%
teacher
mathematics
2
29%
-
in comparison with the results of the final grades of students in subjects,
included in the intermediate (annual) certification
Grade 2
5th grade
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
Most of the students showed good and satisfactory knowledge at the intermediate (annual) certification.
Results of control and diagnostic work in grades 2.5-8 showed that learning was 100% in grade 5 in Russian language and mathematics, in grade 7 in biology and social science, which corresponds to the results of the academic year. Knowledge quality indicators correspond to the indicators of annual marks in the 5th grade in Russian language and mathematics, in the 6th grade in literature, in the 7th grade in biology and social science, in the 8th grade in geography.
The highest percentage of knowledge quality was shown by students:
Grade 7 in biology - 86%, in social studies - 71%;
5th grade in Russian language and mathematics - 67%;
6th grade in literature - 67%;
Grade 8 in geography - 67%.
However, the level of education and the quality of knowledge in the 8th grade in mathematics is 29% lower than the annual one, which indicates insufficient preparation of students for the intermediate (annual) certification.
Students who showed unsatisfactory results at the intermediate (annual) certification: a student of grade 2. ( PMPK certificate) in Russian language and mathematics, two students of the 8th grade. in mathematics - after analyzing the work, eliminating gaps in knowledge, they performed the work again.
In Russian:
2 cells- omission of letters, distortion of words, replacement of letters in a word (67%);
Mistakes made in diagnostic tests mathematics:
2 cells– addition of numbers within 100 (67%);
5 cells- arithmetic operations with decimal fractions (67%), percentages, finding a percentage of a value (50%).
8 cells– systems of inequalities (71%), quadratic equation(71%), area of a parallelogram (86%), middle line triangle (57%), text task (71%).
Mistakes made in diagnostic tests on literature:
6 cells- in part 2: determining the type of rhyme (50%), establishing the correspondence between the work, the author and the character of the work (50%), analyzing the poem (67%); in 3 parts of the work: spelling errors (50%).
Mistakes made in diagnostic tests in German:
6 cells- in the section "Vocabulary and Grammar": the use of modal verbs (67%), the use of pronouns (50%), the declension of nouns (50%); in the "Listening" section: complete understanding of what was heard (83%).
Mistakes made in diagnostic tests in biology:
7 cells- definition multicellular organisms(72%), external structure of insects (58%), development of insects with incomplete transformation (86%), reproduction and development of reptiles (86%), circulatory system of fish (63%).
Mistakes made in diagnostic tests in social studies:
7 cells- tasks of increased complexity: knowledge of the age at which liability for theft begins (57%).
Mistakes made in diagnostic tests by geography:
8 cells– precipitation (86%), soil fertility (57%).
Students Reading Technique (%)
Technics
reading
Classes
(year)
Reading method
Correct reading
Reading Mindfulness
Reading pace
syllables
syllables and words
the words-
mi
without-
fallibility
express-
vigor
fluent
reading
tall
medium-
ny
bottom-
cue
The best results in reading technique are in grade 3, grade 8 and grade 1. Compared with the previous academic year, there is an improvement in the reading technique of students. Trying to increase the quantitative result, students forget about the expressiveness and accuracy of reading. It is necessary to work on the technique of reading for three students in grades 2 and 7, one for each student in grades 5, 6 and 8.
Findings:
1. Most of the students at the intermediate (annual) certification showed good and satisfactory knowledge. Works rated as unsatisfactory were analyzed and re-executed.
2. Education in all subjects was basically 100%, which corresponds to the results of the academic year. However, the indicators of the quality of knowledge in some subjects are lower than the indicators of annual marks. This indicates that teachers in these classes were not able to optimally organize individual preparatory work with poorly performing students, as well as insufficient preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification of the students themselves.
The results of the implementation of a comprehensive test in grade 3
In accordance with the plan of intra-school control and the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of the IEO, from May 19, a final comprehensive control work was carried out in the 3rd grade.
Targetcomprehensivecontrol work– determination of the level of formation of meta-subject results of 3rd grade students based on the results of mastering the program for the 3rd grade of primary school.
Tasks of the integrated controlwork - establishing the level of mastery of key skills (formation of reading skills, the ability to work with text, understand and follow instructions), which allow you to successfully advance in the development of educational material at the next stage of training.
The complex work consisted of two parts: the main part, which checked the formation of meta-subject results at the basic level, and an additional part, which checked the formation of meta-subject results at an advanced level.
The maximum score for completing all work in Grade 3 is 34 points (for tasks of a basic level of complexity - 22, for advanced complexity - 12 points). For independent performance of the work, additional points were given from 0 to 2 points.
The results of the implementation of complex work in the 3rd grade
Final comprehensive work
Quantity
points scored
Number of students
Main part
Additional part
Self-Execution
Additional part
General results of the implementation of complex work
controlled element
3rd grade
Wrote a job
Mastered a basic level of
Completed high-level tasks without errors in complex work
Mastered the basic and advanced levels
Did not master the basic level
Received additional points for independent work
It can be seen from the tables that all students showed high level formation of metasubject results. There are no students who did not cope with the complex work.
High degree independence in the implementation of complex work was shown by four students of the 3rd grade.
Findings:
Thus, the analysis of the results of the final and integrated work showed a high level of assimilation educational program 3rd grade students. There are no students who did not cope with the complex work. The teacher competently implemented a systemic-activity approach in teaching, which contributed to the formation of subject and meta-subject results laid down in the programs of the third year of study.
1. Analyze the results of the interim assessment at meetings of the school's pedagogical council, school methodological associations, take into account the results of certification when planning work for the 2015-2016 academic year, outline ways of correction.
Deadline: until 31.08.2015
Responsible: Deputy Director for WRM
2. To inform parents about the problems identified during the interim (annual) certification.
Deadline: until 06/10/2015
Responsible: class teachers
3. Subject teachers to use forms and methods of optimization and activation cognitive activity when organizing individual preparatory work with students in preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification.
Deadline: during the 2015-2016 academic year.
Responsible: subject teachers
4. Teachers of primary school, Russian language and literature should include exercises for speed reading and accuracy in reading and literature lessons.
Analytical reference
based on the results of the interim (annual)
certification in the 2010-2011 academic year.
In accordance with paragraph 16. Art. 32 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On Education”, as amended, entered into force on January 15, 1996 No. 12-F3, as amended on August 22, 2004,Charter of the school, Regulations on the intermediate (annual) certification of students in transfer classes, annual calendar schedules for 2010-2011 academic year. year, approved by the pedagogical council of the school (protocol No. 1, dated August 30, 2010) from May 15 to May 28, 2011, an intermediate (annual) certification of students in grades 2-8.10 was carried out at the OS.
The following were admitted to the intermediate (annual) certification (see the protocol of the teachers' council dated 24.05.11 No. 9):
- students of the 1st stage - 227 people.
- students of the 2nd stage - 319 people.
- 10th grade students - 48 people.
Pedagogical Council No. 9 dated 24.05. 2011 it was decided:
Exempt from the intermediate (annual) certification on the basis of medical certificates of the following students who are on treatment:
7th grade Samorukov Elena
8th grade Dmitry Kulikov
10th grade Kazakov Alexey
Exempt from intermediate (annual) certification of students with excellent annual marks in all subjects:
Grade 7a - Anastasia Titov;
8b class - Ekaterina Gorpolskaya;
8th grade - Oleinikova Natalia;
8th grade - Blatman Rostislav;
10a class - Ilyin Valery;
10b class - Edward Sargsyan;
10b grade Chernyshov Sergey.
In accordance with the Charter of the school, clause 4 of the Regulations on the intermediate (annual) certification, exempt from the intermediate (annual) certification of students in grades 7,8,10, Winners and prize-winners of the All-Russian Subject Olympiad for schoolchildren of all levels (municipal, regional, all-Russian)
Kupriyanov Maria; Krishchenko Sergei.
Pedagogical Council No. 9 dated May 24. 2011 it was decided:
Do not allow intermediate (annual) certification (in the form of exams) and leave for the autumn re-examination of students with one or two unsatisfactory marks at the end of the year:
7th grade Voitov Artem (algebra, geography)
Glukhova Maxima (algebra, geometry)
Moiseev Sergey (algebra, geometry)
8th grade Ermakova Evgenia (algebra, geometry)
8th grade Korobko Angelica (Russian)
Not to be admitted to the intermediate (annual) certification and to leave for a second course of study students who have three or more unsatisfactory marks at the end of the year:
8th grade - Gozhey Denis
According to the results of the year, leave the following students for a second course of study:
2nd grade Marchenko Vladislav
5th grade Shmakov Kirill
6th grade Alexander Pechenevsky
Intermediate certification was carried out in the form:
Control works:
- in 2nd - 4th grades - Russian language, mathematics, reading technique;
- in grades 5-7 - Russian language, mathematics;
In the 8th grade - algebra;
- in the 10th grade - algebra and the beginning of analysis (according to USE materials) (2 hours), Russian language (2 hours) (based on the USE materials).
Exams:
School Selection Exam:
- 7a - history (by tickets)
- 7b - biology (by tickets)
- 7c - social studies (by tickets)
One of the examsstudents' choice: 8a, 8b, 8c, 10 grades.
227 students of the 1st stage were admitted to the intermediate (annual) attestation.
Pupils of the 1st grade were not attested, where an ungraded system of work is allowed. However, all these classes were given cross-sectional tests in the Russian language, mathematics, reading in order to check the development of the standard.
Intermediate (annual) certification in 2nd - 4th gradescarried out in the form:
Examinations in the Russian language, mathematics, reading technique.
The statistical report on the results of administrative control work (see Appendix No. 1) showed:
- The quality of training is higher at the intermediate certification than the results of the year (by 10% or more):
In Russian
Grade 2b (teacher Zinchenko A.S.) + 17%
Mathematics
Grade 2a (teacher Grishanov N.B.) + 18%
Grade 4a (teacher Garmatina V.A.) + 10%
Reading
Grade 3b (teacher Kulikova N.V.) + 11%
- at the intermediate certification, in comparison with the results of the year (more than 10%):
In Russian
2nd grade (teacher Babich K.N.) - 24%
Mathematics
Grade 3a (teacher Zhirnova G.N.) - 22%
2nd grade (teacher Babich K.N.) - 15%
3rd grade (teacher Salnikova L.V.) -12%
Reading
Grade 3a (teacher Zhirnova G.N.) - 16%
Grade 4a (teacher Garmatina V.A.) - 13%
Grade 4b (teacher Zhirnova G.N.) - 24%
4th grade (teacher Pshenichnova O.V.) - 18%
This indicates that teachers were not able to optimally organize individual preparatory work with poorly performing students, as well as insufficient preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification of the students themselves. It should also be taken into account that in the middle of the school year teachers changed in the 2nd grade, in the 3rd grade. Perhaps the adaptation period has not yet ended, which served to reduce the quality of training in subjects.
Confirmed the high level of quality of training
In Russian
Grade 2a (teacher Grishanova N.B.) 62%
3b (teacher Kulikova N.V.) 82%
3rd grade (teacher Salnikova L.V.) 73%
Grade 4a (teacher Pshenichnova O.V.) 71%
Mathematics
Grade 2b (teacher Zinchenko A.S.) 61%
Grade 3b (teacher Kulikova N.V.) 86%
Grade 4b (teacher Zhirnova G.N.) 74%
4th grade (teacher Pshenichnova O.V.) 68%
Reading
Grade 2a (teacher Grishanova N.B.) 92%
2nd grade (teacher Babich K.N.) 84%
3rd grade (teacher Salnikova L.V.) 89%
Statistical report on the results of control work
(see Appendix No. 2) showed:
- the quality of training is higher at the intermediate certification than the results of the year (10% or more):
5th grade in mathematics (teacher Grigorieva N.M.) + 10%
8th grade in algebra (teacher Grigoryeva N.M.) + 12%
This was made possible through the use of various forms and methods of individual work with low-performing students in the period of preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification.
- Did not confirm the results of the quality of educationat the intermediate certification, in comparison with the results of the year:
6th grade in Russian (teacher Lymareva R.S.) -13%
7th grade in Russian (teacher Kolesnikova T.P.) -14%
10th grade in Russian (teacher Burlakova O.V.) -13%
10th grade in Russian (teacher Burlakova O.V.) -12%
6th grade in mathematics (teacher Grigoryeva N.M.) - 30%
This indicates that teachers in these classes were not able to optimally organize individual preparatory work with poorly performing students, as well as insufficient preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification of the students themselves.
The quality of training remained at the same high level (60% or more), in comparison with the results of the year:
5th grade in Russian (teacher Burlakova O.V.) 65%
5th grade in mathematics (teacher Afonina N.E.) 70%
7th grade in algebra (teacher Denisova V.V.) 79%
8th grade in algebra (teacher Denisova V.V.) 78%
10th grade in algebra (teacher Denisova V.V.) 68%
Analyzing the results of intermediate certification in the form of tests UO-82% KO-53% in comparison with the results of the year UO-98% KO-57%, one should pay attention to the negative dynamics of UO and KO, which indicates a biased assessment of students' knowledge. Negative dynamics of VR on control work is explained by the fact that in each class children with a low level of opportunities study, individual work is carried out with these children during the entire study time, teachers, a psychologist, a social pedagogue, in order to teach this category of students to the standard. In addition, it should be taken into account that during the entire academic year there is a movement of children living in the GU RO SRC, who, as a rule, do not attend school for a long time, and therefore do not fulfill the educational standard.
The statistical report on the results of the compulsory school choice examinations (see Appendix No. 3,4) showed:
- the quality of training is lower at the intermediate certification than the results of the year:
7th grade in history (teacher Kerentseva N.G.) - 4%
7th grade in biology (teacher Chernyshova I.E.) -19%
Grade 7b in social studies (teacher Kirilina N.I.) - 9%
This indicates that the teachers in these classes were not able to optimally organize individual preparatory work with poorly performing students, as well as insufficient preparation for the intermediate (annual) attestation of the students themselves. pupils of the 7th grade for the first time passed the intermediate (annual) certification in oral form (by tickets).
The statistical report on the results of examinations for the choice of students (see Appendix No. 3.4) showed:
- confirmed the high level of quality of training (100%):
8th grade in geography (teacher Perlova E.A.)
8th grade in Russian (teacher Yusina A.P.)
8-a, in the Russian language class (teacher Chernikova A.N.)
8-a, b, c class in chemistry (teacher Kovalenko O.N.)
8th grade in biology (teacher Chernyshova I.E.)
8th grade English language(teacher Permyakova T.N.)
10th grade in biology (teacher Shkondina O.I.)
10th grade in biology (teacher Chernyshova I.E.)
10th grade in geography (teacher Perlova E.A.)
10th grade in history (teacher Eliseeva S.V.)
10-a, b class in chemistry (teacher Kovalenko O.N.)
10-a, b class in computer science (teacher Kovalenko E.G.)
- remained at the same level, i.e. confirmed the results of the year:
8-a, b, c history class (teacher Kerentseva N.G.) 66%
8-a, b, c class in social studies (teacher Kerentseva N.G.) 50%
8th grade in biology (teacher Shkondina O.I.) 43%
8-a, b, c class in physics (teacher Konkova E.V.) 67%
8th grade in geometry (teacher Denisova V.V.) 75%
10a,b class in social studies (teacher Skvortsova Z.E.) 88%
10th grade in Russian (teacher Burlakova O.V.) 60%
10-a, b class in physics (teacher Konkova E.V.) 75%
This became possible due to the ability of these teachers to correctly plan the preparatory work for the interim (annual) certification, using individual forms and methods of working with students, as well as a responsible attitude towards preparing students for exams.
The most popular subjects for intermediate (annual) certification in the 2010-2011 academic year were:
Social science 10th grade (teacher Skvortsova Z.E.) - 16 people (33%)
Physics 8th grade (teacher Konkova E.V.) - 15 people. (23%)
Subject teachers need to more actively use the forms and methods of optimization and activation of cognitive activity in organizing individual preparatory work with students in preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification.
In accordance with the Charter of the school, with the Procedure for conducting intermediate (annual) certification of students in grades 2-8, 10, students who completed the 2010-2011 academic year with excellent marks were awarded with a certificate of merit:
Bocharova Valeria |
|
Pigareva Olga |
|
Grechkina Sofia |
|
Semenova Alena |
|
Baigin Inel |
|
Averchenko Ekaterina |
|
Vovk Alina |
|
Kulikova Anastasia |
|
Shlyakhov Alexander |
|
Neklyudova Ekaterina |
|
Kiss Tatiana |
|
Marchenko Anastasia |
|
Poddubskaya Ekaterina |
|
Muntyan Ilya |
|
Shulkin Ilya |
|
Filippova Arina |
|
Vdovenko Anastasia |
|
Gorbunov Victor |
|
Gumenyuk Alexey |
|
Lebedev Kirill |
|
Popova Elena |
|
White Catherine |
|
Pronchenko Sofia |
|
Prokhorova Valentina |
|
Kapchunova Maria |
|
Lebedeva Anastasia |
|
Bratchikova Elena |
|
Bezborodko Ekaterina |
|
Zharkova Sofia |
|
Goleusova Irina |
|
Kovalchuk Julia |
|
Alibaev Alexander |
|
Titova Anastasia |
|
Biryukova Natalya |
|
Pavlovskaya Olesya |
|
Gorpolskaya Ekaterina |
|
Oleinikova Natalya |
|
Blatman Rostislav |
|
10a | Ilyina Valeria |
10b | Sargsyan Eduard |
Chernyshov Sergey |
The educational and material base of the school allows for an organized, modern level of educational work with students. However, the success rate for individual classes remains insufficiently high. This is due to the fact that children with a low level of opportunities study in these classes.
Many students have "3" in one subject. This fact indicates insufficiently close contacts between class teachers and subject teachers, the need for an individual approach in assessing students' learning and more rational use of additional hours for individual work with promising students.
The annual analysis of progress in subjects made it possible to determine their rating:
thing | SV (%) | KO (%) |
Informatics | ||
Physical Education | ||
ISO | ||
Technology | ||
Music | ||
life safety fundamentals | ||
Reading (n.sh.) | ||
Natural History (n.sh.) | ||
Economy | ||
Chemistry | ||
MHC | ||
Social science | ||
Drawing | ||
Literature | ||
Mathematics (n.sh.) | ||
Story | ||
Biology | ||
Foreign language | ||
Russian language (n.sh.) | ||
Geography | ||
Physics | ||
Russian language | ||
Mathematics, algebra | ||
Geometry |
Based on the above:
- The administration to hold a meeting of the school's pedagogical council, at which to analyze the results of the interim (annual) certification.
- Subject methodological associations to study and use in their work the normative documents regulating the requirements for the level of training of students in the subjects of the curriculum.
- Subject school m / o to analyze the results of the intermediate (annual) certification and at the August meetings to take into account the results of certification when planning work for the 2011-2012 academic year, to outline ways of correction.
- Subject teachers should use the forms and methods of optimization and activation of cognitive activity in organizing individual preparatory work with students in preparation for the intermediate (annual) certification.
- The school administration and the heads of subject CMEs, when accumulating a bank of meters, draw up individual tasks for students with a low level of abilities.
- School administrations and heads of subject m / o, when accumulating a bank of meters, should use test materials more widely in preparation for the Unified State Examination, GIA, as well as a new form of passing exams in the final grades (Grade 4).
The report was written by Deputy director for water resources management of MOU secondary school No. 17
Chernyshova I.E. and Eliseeva S.V.