Endless terrorist attacks, ongoing armed conflicts, ongoing disagreements between Russia, the United States and the European Union indicate that peace on our planet is literally hanging by a thread. This situation is alarming, both among politicians and among ordinary people. It is no coincidence that the issue of the start of the Third World War is being seriously discussed by the entire world community.
Expert opinion
Some political scientists believe that the mechanism of war was already launched several years ago. It all started with Ukraine, when a corrupt president was removed from office and the new government in the country was called illegitimate, but simply a junta. Then they announced to the whole world that it was fascist and began to scare one sixth of the land with it. In the minds of the people of the two fraternal peoples, distrust was first sown, and then outright enmity. A full-scale information war began, in which everything was subordinated to inciting hatred between people.
This confrontation was painful for the families, relatives, friends of the two fraternal peoples. It got to the point that the politicians of the two countries are ready to push brother against brother. The situation on the Internet also speaks of the danger of the situation. Various discussion platforms and forums have turned into real battlefields where everything is allowed.
If someone else doubts the likelihood of war, then he can simply go to any social network and see what intensity the discussions of topical issues reach, starting with information about oil quotes and ending with the upcoming Eurovision Song Contest.
If it is possible to quarrel two fraternal peoples who shared grief and victories for more than 360 years, then what can we say about other countries. Any nation can be called an enemy overnight, having prepared timely information support in the media and the Internet. So, for example, it was with Turkey.
At present, Russia is testing new methods of war on the example of Crimea, Donbass, Ukraine, and Syria. Why deploy multi-million armies, transfer troops, if you can carry out a "successful information attack", and to top it off send a small contingent of "little green men". Fortunately, there is already positive experience in Georgia, Crimea, Syria and the Donbass.
Some political observers believe that it all started in Iraq, when the US decided to remove the supposedly undemocratic president and carried out Operation Desert Storm. As a result, the country's natural resources came under US control.
Having made a little “fat” in the 2000s and having carried out a number of military operations, Russia decided not to give in and prove to the whole world that it “got up from its knees”. Hence such “decisive” actions in Syria, in the Crimea and in the Donbass. In Syria, we protect the whole world from ISIS, in Crimea, Russians from Bandera, in the Donbass, the Russian-speaking population from Ukrainian punishers.
In fact, an invisible confrontation between the United States and Russia has already begun. America does not want to share its dominance in the world with the Russian Federation. Direct evidence of this is the current Syria.
Tension in different parts of the world, where the interests of the two countries are in contact, will only grow.
There are experts who believe that the tension with America is caused by the fact that the latter is aware of the loss of its leading position against the backdrop of a rising China and wants to destroy Russia in order to seize its natural wealth. Various methods are used to weaken the Russian Federation:
- EU sanctions;
- lower oil prices;
- involvement of the Russian Federation in the arms race;
- support of protest moods in Russia.
America is doing everything to repeat the situation of 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed.
War in Russia is inevitable in 2020
This point of view is shared by the American political analyst I. Hagopian. He posted his thoughts on this subject on the GlobalResears website. He noted that there are all signs of preparing the United States and Russia for war. The author notes that America will be supported by:
- NATO countries;
- Israel;
- Australia;
- all US satellites around the world.
Russia's allies include China and India. The expert believes that the United States is waiting for bankruptcy and therefore it will attempt to take possession of the wealth of the Russian Federation. He also stressed that some states may disappear as a result of this conflict.
Similar forecasts are given by former head of NATO A. Shirreff. For this, he even wrote a book about the war with Russia. In it, he notes the inevitability of a military confrontation with America. According to the plot of the book, Russia captures the Baltic states. NATO countries come to its defense. As a result, World War III begins. On the one hand, the plot looks frivolous and implausible, but on the other hand, given that the work was written by retired general, then the scenario looks quite plausible.
Who will win America or Russia
To answer this question, it is necessary to compare the military power of the two powers:
| Armament | Russia | USA |
| active army | 1.4 million people | 1.1 million people |
| Reserve | 1.3 million people | 2.4 million people |
| Airports and runways | 1218 | 13513 |
| Aircraft | 3082 | 13683 |
| Helicopters | 1431 | 6225 |
| tanks | 15500 | 8325 |
| armored vehicles | 27607 | 25782 |
| Self-propelled guns | 5990 | 1934 |
| Towed artillery | 4625 | 1791 |
| MLRS | 4026 | 830 |
| Ports and terminals | 7 | 23 |
| Warships | 352 | 473 |
| Aircraft carriers | 1 | 10 |
| Submarines | 63 | 72 |
| attack ships | 77 | 17 |
| Budget | 76 trillion. | 612 trillion. |
Success in war depends not only on superiority in weapons. According to military expert Y. Shields, the Third World War will not be like the two previous wars. fighting will be held according to computer technology. They will become shorter, but the number of victims will be in the thousands. Nuclear weapon they are unlikely to be used, but chemical and bacteriological weapons, as an auxiliary means, are not excluded.
Attacks will be made not only on the battlefield, but also in:
- the field of communications;
- the Internet;
- television;
- economy;
- finance;
- politics;
- space.
Something similar is happening in Ukraine now. The offensive is on all fronts. Blatant disinformation, hacker attacks on financial servers, economic sabotage, discrediting politicians, diplomats, terrorist attacks, shutting down broadcast satellites, and much more can cause irreparable damage to the enemy along with military operations at the front.
Psychic Predictions
Throughout history, there have been many prophets who predicted the end of mankind. One of them is Nostradamus. As for world wars, he accurately predicted the first two. As for the Third World War, he said that it would happen through the fault of the Antichrist, who would stop at nothing and be terribly merciless.
The next psychic whose prophecies have come true is Vanga. She told future generations that World War III would start with a small state in Asia. The fastest is Syria. The reason for the hostilities will be an attack on four heads of state. The consequences of the war will be horrendous.
The famous psychic P. Globa also said his words regarding the Third World War. His forecasts can be called optimistic. He said that humanity will end World War III if it prevents military action in Iran.
The psychics listed above are not the only ones who predicted World War III. Similar predictions were made:
- A. Ilmaier;
- Mulchiasl;
- Edgar Cayce;
- G. Rasputin;
- Bishop Anthony;
- Saint Hilarion and others
The most dangerous period for Russia will come in the early 2020s, when the technological re-equipment of developed countries and China begins, and the United States and others Western countries come out of the depression of 2008-2018. and make a new technological leap.
The risks of a third world war will persist until the US leadership gives up its claims to global dominance. Along with the Ukrainian hotbed of fomenting a world chaotic war, the United States continues to support armed conflicts in Syria and Iraq, destabilize the situation in the Middle East, prepare an invasion of the Taliban and Islamic militants in Central Asia, design "color revolutions" in Russia and other countries of Eurasian integration, and also organize coups d'état in countries of Latin America that have escaped Washington's control. The United States is being pushed towards a world war by the objective laws of global economic and political dynamics. Their understanding makes it possible to predict military-political activity for the next decade.
An analysis of the economic and political dynamics shows that the most likely period of major regional military conflicts involving the United States and its satellites against Russia is 2015-2018.
This is the period of the exit of a new technological order from the birth phase into the growth phase, when the formation of its technological trajectory is completed and the modernization of the economy begins on its basis. It is during this period that technological shifts entail changes in the structure international relations. Countries that have risen to the wave of growth of a new technological order earlier than others are gaining competitive advantages in the world market and are beginning to oust the former leaders, who have to make great efforts to overcome the crisis of capital overaccumulation in outdated production and technological structures.
A struggle is unfolding between new and old leaders of technical and economic development for dominance in the world market, which leads to an increase in international tension and provokes military-political conflicts that have so far led to world wars. It is this period that begins at the present time, which will last until 2020-2022,
when the structure of a new technological order is finally formed, and the world economy enters a phase of sustainable growth based on it.
…It should be noted that the Ukrainian crisis began earlier than the forecast estimate.
If Yanukovych had signed an association agreement with the EU in November, then everything would have happened a year and a half later, at the time of the next presidential election.
By that time, the mechanisms for managing the economic, foreign and defense policy of Ukraine by the EU, provided for by this agreement, would have started to work. The newly formed Ukrainian-Polish-Lithuanian battalions would have already been created and deployed on the borders with Russia. The procedures for joint actions of European and Ukrainian armed forces in the settlement of regional conflicts. Although the agreement provides for Ukraine's obligation to act in these conflicts under the leadership of the EU, as well as to follow its foreign and defense policies, it is clear that the real organization of military operations will be handled by NATO under the leadership of Washington.
There is no doubt that at the time of the presidential elections in the spring of 2015, the same techniques would have been used to replace Yanukovych with a US protege as during the coup d'état last winter. Only the change of power would have been carried out in a relatively legitimate way, which excluded Russian interference in Ukrainian affairs, not to mention reunification with Crimea. The government and law enforcement agencies in Kyiv formed by the Americans from their agents would have taken a course towards joining Ukraine to NATO and ousting Black Sea Fleet Russia from Crimea. Russia would be opposed not by Nazi bandit formations, but by completely legitimate Ukrainian-European military contingents relying on the entire military might of NATO. A US-led legitimate Ukrainian government would break off cooperation with Russia in the defense industry, start an anti-Russian media campaign no less rabid than now, and force the Ukrainization of the South-East of Ukraine. Russia would be in a much worse position than it is now: after reunification with Crimea and the establishment of the Nazi regime in Kyiv, whose illegitimacy and criminal actions doom Ukraine to catastrophe and collapse.
The socio-economic catastrophe that has engulfed Ukraine and the growing chaos in this territory do not meet the interests of Russia, for which Ukraine has been and remains an integral part of the Russian world, technologically, economically and spiritually connected with the Russian Federation. The catastrophic scenario could have been avoided if Yanukovych had not followed the lead of American and European emissaries, protected the state from the Nazi rebellion and prevented a coup d'état.
However, for the United States, this would be tantamount to defeat in the long anti-Russian campaign that they waged in Ukraine throughout the post-Soviet period. Therefore, everything possible and impossible was done with the involvement of gigantic political, informational and financial resources to organize a coup d'état in Kyiv with the transfer of power over Ukraine to pro-American agents of influence. Yes, for this adventure - if Russia conducts a competent and decisive defense of itself and the world from the American policy of unleashing a world chaotic war - the United States risks paying with its ideological and political leadership. But, apparently, "Paris is worth the mass" - American policy in pursuit of maximum geostrategic "profit" has ceased to take into account the associated risks.
From 2017, a new electoral cycle will begin in the United States, which, most likely, will be mixed up with Russophobia as the ideological basis of the coming world war.
By that time, the crisis in the American financial system may manifest itself in a reduction in budget expenditures, a depreciation of the dollar, and a tangible deterioration in the standard of living of the population. External US aggression may bog down in the Middle East and fail in Afghanistan and Iraq. The pressure of internal problems and crises in foreign policy, on the one hand, will provoke an increase in the aggressiveness of the American leadership, and on the other hand, will weaken its position. But in the case of intellectual, economic and military mobilization, Russia has a chance not to lose in the conflicts of 2015-2018, since the United States and its satellites will not yet be ready for open aggression.
But in the period 2021-2025. Russia may again lag behind technologically and economically, which will devalue its defense potential and sharply intensify internal social and interethnic conflicts, as happened with the USSR in the late 1980s.
American analysts from the CIA and other agencies are directly betting on the collapse of Russia from within after 2020.
This will happen, in their opinion, due to internal social and interethnic conflicts initiated from outside using the problems of social and regional inequality, as well as a decrease in the standard of living of the population of our country.
To this end, the United States is consistently cultivating its "fifth column" among the Russian political, business and intellectual elite, allocating for these purposes, according to some estimates, up to $10 billion a year. The recent appointment of the most famous organizer of "color revolutions" and state coups in post-Soviet space John Tefft.
To avoid the implementation of the most negative scenario for Russia, leading to the disintegration of the country, a systemic internal and foreign policy strengthening national security, ensuring economic independence, increasing international competitiveness and advancing the development of the national economy, mobilizing society and modernizing the defense industry.
By 2017, when the new technological order enters the growth phase, and the struggle for world leadership reaches its maximum intensity, Russian army must have modern and effective weapons, Russian society— to be united and self-confident, the Russian intellectual elite — to master new technologies, Russian economy— to be on the wave of the growth of a new technological order, and Russian politics and diplomacy — to organize a broad anti-war coalition of countries,
not interested in unleashing a new world war and capable of stopping American aggression by concerted action.
Such an international coalition is needed not only to prevent war, but also to win it if war turns out to be inevitable.
An anti-war coalition could include:
- European countries that are drawn into the war against Russia contrary to their national interests;
— the BRICS countries, whose economic growth can be torpedoed by the global destabilization organized by the United States;
- Korea, the countries of Indochina, which are not interested in worsening relations with Russia;
- the countries of the Near and Middle East, for which a world war will mean an escalation of their own regional conflicts;
- the Latin American countries of the Bolivarian Alliance, for which the unwinding of a new world war means a direct US invasion;
- developing countries of the "Group of 77", heirs of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, traditionally opposed to wars, for a just world order.
As an incentive for the creation of such a coalition, it is necessary to put forward the common threats for all its members that the United States will unleash a global chaotic war. An important condition for the successful creation of such a coalition, as noted above, is to deprive the United States of its monopoly on ideological dominance by consistently exposing the anti-human consequences of their interventions, the massacres of civilians by their military personnel, the devastating results of the rule of American proteges in various countries.
It is necessary to destroy the image of American infallibility, to expose the cynicism and deception on the part of American leaders, the catastrophic consequences of their policy of double standards, the incompetence and ignorance of American officials and politicians.
Influential allies in the creation of an anti-war coalition could be religious organizations that oppose the inculcation of the cult of permissiveness and debauchery, the undermining of family and other universal values. They would help the members of the coalition to work out and offer the world a new unifying ideology based on the restoration of the unshakable moral limits of human arbitrariness. A constructive role could be played by international humanitarian and anti-fascist organizations. An ally could be the world scientific and expert community, speaking from the standpoint of sustainable development and generating development projects that unite humanity.
The actions of the anti-war coalition should be aimed not only at exposing and destroying the political dominance of the United States, but, above all, at undermining the American military and political power based on the issuance of the dollar as a world currency. In the event that the aggressive actions of the United States to foment a world war continue, they should include a refusal to use the dollar in mutual trade and from dollar instruments for placing its gold and foreign exchange assets.
The anti-war coalition must develop a positive program for organizing the global financial and economic architecture on the principles of mutual benefit, justice and respect for national sovereignty.
We have already mentioned above the measures necessary for this to achieve financial stabilization, improve the efficiency of regulation of the financial market, banking, financial and investment institutions, stimulate the growth of a new technological order and progressive structural changes, and form appropriate new institutions. They must address the fundamental causes of the global crisis.
The most dangerous period for Russia will come in the early 2020s, when the technological re-equipment of developed countries and China will begin, and the United States and other Western countries will emerge from the depression of 2008-2018. and make a new technological leap.
The risks of a third world war will persist until the US leadership gives up its claims to global dominance. Along with the Ukrainian hotbed of fomenting a world chaotic war, the United States continues to support armed conflicts in Syria and Iraq, destabilize the situation in the Middle East, prepare the invasion of the Taliban and Islamic militants in Central Asia, design “color revolutions” in Russia and other countries of Eurasian integration, and also organize coups d'état in countries of Latin America that have escaped Washington's control. The United States is being pushed towards a world war by the objective laws of global economic and political dynamics. Their understanding makes it possible to predict military-political activity for the next decade.
An analysis of the economic and political dynamics shows that the most likely period of major regional military conflicts involving the United States and its satellites against Russia is 2015-2018.
This is the period of the exit of a new technological order from the birth phase into the growth phase, when the formation of its technological trajectory is completed and the modernization of the economy begins on its basis. It is during this period that technological shifts entail changes in the structure of international relations. Countries that have risen to the wave of growth of a new technological order earlier than others are gaining competitive advantages in the world market and are beginning to oust the former leaders, who have to make great efforts to overcome the crisis of capital overaccumulation in outdated production and technological structures. A struggle is unfolding between new and old leaders of technical and economic development for dominance in the world market, which leads to an increase in international tension and provokes military-political conflicts that have so far led to world wars. It is this period that begins at the present time, which will last until 2020-2022, when the structure of the new technological order is finally formed, and the world economy enters a phase of sustainable growth based on it.
…It should be noted that the Ukrainian crisis began earlier than the forecast estimate.
If Yanukovych had signed an association agreement with the EU in November, then everything would have happened a year and a half later, at the time of the next presidential election.
By that time, the mechanisms for managing the economic, foreign and defense policy of Ukraine by the EU, provided for by this agreement, would have started to work. The newly formed Ukrainian-Polish-Lithuanian battalions would have already been created and deployed on the borders with Russia. The procedures for joint actions of the European and Ukrainian armed forces in the settlement of regional conflicts would be worked out. Although the agreement provides for Ukraine's obligation to act in these conflicts under the leadership of the EU, as well as to follow its foreign and defense policies, it is clear that the real organization of military operations will be handled by NATO under the leadership of Washington.
There is no doubt that at the time of the presidential elections in the spring of 2015, the same techniques would have been used to replace Yanukovych with a US protege as during the coup d'état last winter. Only the change of power would have been carried out in a relatively legitimate way, which excluded Russian interference in Ukrainian affairs, not to mention reunification with Crimea. The government and law enforcement agencies in Kyiv, formed by the Americans from their agents, would have taken a course towards joining Ukraine to NATO and ousting the Russian Black Sea Fleet from Crimea. Russia would be opposed not by Nazi bandit formations, but by completely legitimate Ukrainian-European military contingents relying on the entire military might of NATO. A US-led legitimate Ukrainian government would break off cooperation with Russia in the defense industry, start an anti-Russian media campaign no less rabid than now, and force the Ukrainization of the South-East of Ukraine. Russia would be in a much worse position than now: after reunification with Crimea and the establishment of the Nazi regime in Kyiv, whose illegitimacy and criminal actions doom Ukraine to catastrophe and collapse.
Of course, the socio-economic catastrophe that has engulfed Ukraine and the growing chaos in this territory do not meet the interests of Russia, for which Ukraine has been and remains an integral part of the Russian world, technologically, economically and spiritually connected with the Russian Federation. The catastrophic scenario could have been avoided if Yanukovych had not followed the lead of American and European emissaries, protected the state from the Nazi rebellion and prevented a coup d'état. However, for the United States, this would be tantamount to defeat in the long anti-Russian campaign that they waged in Ukraine throughout the post-Soviet period. Therefore, everything possible and impossible was done with the involvement of gigantic political, informational and financial resources to organize a coup d'état in Kyiv with the transfer of power over Ukraine to pro-American agents of influence. Yes, for this adventure - if Russia conducts a competent and decisive defense of itself and the world from the American policy of unleashing a world chaotic war - the United States risks paying with its ideological and political leadership. But, apparently, "Paris is worth the mass" - the American policy in pursuit of maximum geostrategic "profit" has ceased to take into account the associated risks.
From 2017, a new electoral cycle will begin in the United States, which, most likely, will be mixed up with Russophobia as the ideological basis of the coming world war.
By that time, the crisis in the American financial system may manifest itself in a reduction in budget expenditures, a depreciation of the dollar, and a tangible deterioration in the standard of living of the population. External US aggression may bog down in the Middle East and fail in Afghanistan and Iraq. The pressure of internal problems and crises in foreign policy, on the one hand, will provoke an increase in the aggressiveness of the American leadership, and, on the other hand, will weaken its position. But in the case of intellectual, economic and military mobilization, Russia has a chance not to lose in the conflicts of 2015-2018, since the United States and its satellites will not yet be ready for open aggression.
But in the period 2021-2025. Russia may again lag behind technologically and economically, which will devalue its defense potential and sharply intensify internal social and interethnic conflicts, as happened with the USSR in the late 1980s.
American analysts from the CIA and other agencies are directly betting on the collapse of Russia from within after 2020.
This will happen, in their opinion, due to internal social and interethnic conflicts initiated from outside using the problems of social and regional inequality, as well as a decrease in the standard of living of the population of our country.
To this end, the United States is consistently cultivating its "fifth column" among the Russian political, business and intellectual elite, allocating for these purposes, according to some estimates, up to $10 billion a year. The recent appointment of John Tefft, the most famous organizer of "color revolutions" and coup d'état in the post-Soviet space, as the new US ambassador to Russia, testifies to the same.
To avoid the implementation of the most negative scenario for Russia, leading to the disintegration of the country, a systemic domestic and foreign policy is needed to strengthen national security, ensure economic independence, increase international competitiveness and accelerate the development of the national economy, mobilize society and modernize the defense industry. By 2017, when the new technological order enters the growth phase, and the struggle for world leadership reaches its maximum intensity, the Russian army must have modern and effective weapons, Russian society must be united and self-confident, and the Russian intellectual elite must own new technologies , the Russian economy - to be on the wave of growth of a new technological order, and Russian politics and diplomacy - to organize a broad anti-war coalition of countries that are not interested in starting a new world war and are capable of stopping American aggression by concerted actions.
Such an international coalition is needed not only to prevent war, but also to win it if war turns out to be inevitable.
An anti-war coalition could include:
European countries who are drawn into the war against Russia contrary to their national interests;
The BRICS countries, whose economic growth can be torpedoed by the global destabilization organized by the USA;
Korea, the countries of Indochina, which are not interested in worsening relations with Russia;
The countries of the Near and Middle East, for which a world war will mean an escalation of their own regional conflicts;
Latin American countries of the Bolivarian Alliance, for which the unwinding of a new world war means a direct US invasion;
Developing countries of the Group of 77, heirs of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, traditionally opposed to wars, for a just world order.
As an incentive for the creation of such a coalition, it is necessary to put forward the common threats for all its members that the United States will unleash a global chaotic war. An important condition for the successful creation of such a coalition, as noted above, is to deprive the United States of its monopoly on ideological dominance by consistently exposing the inhuman consequences of their interventions, the massacres of civilians by their military personnel, and the destructive results of the rule of American proteges in various countries.
It is necessary to destroy the image of American infallibility, to expose the cynicism and deception on the part of American leaders, the catastrophic consequences of their policy of double standards, the incompetence and ignorance of American officials and politicians.
Influential allies in the creation of an anti-war coalition could be religious organizations that oppose the inculcation of the cult of permissiveness and debauchery, the undermining of family and other universal values. They would help the members of the coalition to work out and offer the world a new unifying ideology based on the restoration of the unshakable moral limits of human arbitrariness. A constructive role could be played by international humanitarian and anti-fascist organizations. An ally could be the world scientific and expert community, speaking from the standpoint of sustainable development and generating development projects that unite humanity.
The actions of the anti-war coalition should be aimed not only at exposing and destroying the political dominance of the United States, but, above all, at undermining the American military-political power based on the issuance of the dollar as a world currency. In the event that the aggressive actions of the United States to foment a world war continue, they should include a refusal to use the dollar in mutual trade and from dollar instruments for placing its gold and foreign exchange assets.
The anti-war coalition must develop a positive program for organizing the global financial and economic architecture on the principles of mutual benefit, justice and respect for national sovereignty.
We have already mentioned above the measures necessary for this to achieve financial stabilization, improve the efficiency of regulation of the financial market, banking, financial and investment institutions, stimulate the growth of a new technological order and progressive structural changes, and form appropriate new institutions. They must address the fundamental causes of the global crisis.
Dear readers! We invite you to subscribe to our
This article may seem intimidating. But we all live in such a time that the beginning new war global scale is becoming a real prospect. In the article we will answer the question of whether the date of the beginning of the Third World War is predicted or not.
modern warfare
In the view of most people who grew up on filmography based on the Great Patriotic War, the standard of fighting looks like a clipping from a movie. Reasoning logically, we understand that exactly how ridiculous a saber from 1917 in the hands of Soviet soldier 1941, it will be strange to observe a picture of barbed wire being cut at night by partisans in our time.
Yes, and you must admit, having weapons of mass destruction in the form of nuclear charges, bacteriological crops and climate control, it is paradoxical to expect a repetition of the classics in the form of a bayonet-knife and a dugout.
Quiet panic, gradually undermining the Internet users and skillfully fueled by the media, is felt in the thousands of requests received every hour. People are so convinced of the inevitability of trouble that they almost never ask questions - will it happen? Much more relevant is the clumsy wording: when is the exact date for the start of World War III set?
And now this is scary.
Battle for resources
The era when forests, fields, rivers and the defeated people were the main contribution to the winner has passed irrevocably. Today, the greatness of the country is dictated not by population and not by a rich history of victories, but by the possession of underground treasures: oil sources, natural gas deposits, coal seams, uranium deposits.
The date of the beginning of the Third World War is not hushed up. She just passed so long ago that her exact number is hardly preserved in the minds. The dream of the engines of trade policy has come true - the economy and the struggle for first place in the leadership elite have become the main values of life.
Here it is useful to recall the main method of trade relations, which works everywhere and at all times. The most selective piece was never given to those who bargained and fought for it - there was always someone third, standing aside and sympathetically watching the fight.
Based on events: how can it be
Many will intervene, one will get it. It is no secret that the main threat to Russia is attributed to the United States, but the events unfolding around the world's largest leaders suggest that the general tension creates only the appearance of a real threat. The flow of information masterfully maintains the highest bar on the scale of mass hysteria, while the war unleashed by a mighty power (read - the United States) began a long time ago.
Events in Ukraine, Iraq, and Syria speak not of spontaneous, but of carefully thought-out actions, on which not a single hundred analysts with a wealth of strategic experience have worked, which simply does not exist in any of these countries. After all, we are not talking about random clashes, reminiscent of the previous yard-to-yard fights - we are talking about a war that draws in the masses. And here all sorts of peacekeeping missions with the introduction of friendly troops at the ready with friendly weapons only fuel the hostile mood.
The EU readily accepts information in the form in which it is presented by the United States - the EU apparently has neither the time nor the initiative to investigate. Like a bull on a red rag, the leaders of the European Union will react to the slightest move by the United States towards military action against Russia.
This will give a reason to talk for a long time to the restraining Chinese government. The stagnation of American troops in the Pacific region has long poisoned the existence of the patient Chinese, whose hand is already tired of trembling over the nuclear button. The reaction of Israel is also predictable - the long-awaited consensual nod from the United States will allow them to fall on Tehran, but how long will Israel itself last after that, big question. The last volleys in Iraq will hardly have time to die down, as Libyan, Omani, Yemeni and (where without them) Egyptian bombs will simply sweep away the unlucky aggressor.
Anyone else interested in the start date of World War III? Then we discuss further.
Side view - how it will be
It is useful to hear what he thinks about the events, it is scary to say - the future, retired Colonel General Anatoly Lopata, the former chief General Staff Armed Forces of Ukraine and First Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine. Looking ahead, we note that the remark of the former Minister of Defense about the location of the future battlefield completely coincides with the opinion of British Air Force Colonel Ian Shields.
When asked by journalists what, in fact, the Third World War is and when it will begin, Anatoly Lopata calmly explained that the war is in full swing and the aggressor country is called in it - who would you think? - of course, Russia. And even in relation to America, at least in the fact that it responds with sympathy to the Assad regime in Syria (!). At the same time, the colonel general admits that the United States is forced to reckon with the Russian Federation and this will remain unchanged, due to the huge economic and military potential of the latter.
The date of the start of the Third World War, according to the specialist, thus belongs to the distant past, but its development to the scale of epic battles is in the future, which still needs to be lived up to. Anatoly Lopata even shared a mysterious figure - 50. In his opinion, it is after this number of years that the warring powers will clash in the wide expanses of space.
Analyst forecasts
Joachim Hagopian, who has been known since 2015, warned that the recruitment of "friends" by the US and Russia is not accidental. China and India will follow Russia in any case, and the EU countries have no choice but to accept America's policy. In Korea, Hagopian predicted military neutrality with respect to both powers, but a rather stormy internecine war with the possibility of activating nuclear charges. It can be assumed that the day powerful weapon will be put into action, and there is a date for the start of the Third World War.
Alexander Richard Schiffer, an interesting personality and former head of NATO, in his book: "2017: War with Russia", predicted the defeat of the United States due to financial collapse, followed by the collapse of the American army.
Vladimir Zhirinovsky, as always, is unambiguous and says what the majority is delicately silent about. He is confident that America will not start any open action until all the countries involved in the military conflict squabble among themselves in collapse, and, exhausted, lay down what remains of their weapons. Then the US will generously gather up the dejected losers and emerge as the sole winner.
Sergei Glazyev, Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation, proposes to create a coalition that fundamentally does not support a military policy against Russia. The set of countries that are officially ready to speak out in favor of renunciation of armed conflict, according to him, will be such that America will simply be forced to moderate its appetites.
According to Vanga
The date of the beginning of the Third World War Vanga, the most famous Bulgarian seer, either could not or did not want to predict. In order not to confuse the minds with specifics, the clairvoyant said only that she sees religious strife around the world as the cause of the war. Drawing a parallel with current events, it can be assumed that the date of the start of the Third World War, which Vanga did not predict, falls on the period of terrorist acts of the ISIS group disguised as offended religious feelings.
Operating with exact dates
How not to mention the world-famous American Horatio Villegas, whose vision of fiery spheres hitting the earth from heaven in 2015 became a sensation. Adjusting quite materialistic tasks to the act of clairvoyance, Horatio hastened to announce that he knew the date of the start of the Third World War - 05/13/2017. With regret or great joy, we note that no one had to observe the fireballs on May 13.
It remains to be hoped that people who expected big events in March 2017 were not very upset when they lost confirmation of the words of astrologer Vlad Ross. Recall that this person also named the date of the start of the Third World War - 03/26/2017, which did not find a response in reality.