To take the test, you will need a piece of paper and a pen.
Instruction:
This blank test is for rapid evaluation well-being, activity and mood (the questionnaire is named after the first letters of these functional states).
The essence of assessment is that the subjects are asked to correlate their state with a number of signs on a multi-stage scale. This scale consists of indices (3 2 1 0 1 2 3) and is located between thirty pairs of words of opposite meaning, reflecting mobility, speed and rate of functions (activity), strength, health, fatigue (well-being), as well as characteristics emotional state(mood). The subject must select and mark the number that most accurately reflects his condition at the time of the examination. The advantage of the technique is its repeatability, that is, it is permissible to repeatedly use the test with the same subject.
During processing, these figures are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to unsatisfactory health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; index 2 following it - for 2; index 1 - for 3 points and so on until index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points (note that the poles of the scale are constantly changing).
So positive states always get high scores, and negative ones are low. According to these "reduced" scores, the arithmetic mean is calculated both in general and separately for activity, well-being and mood. For example, the average scores for a sample of Moscow students are: well-being - 5.4; activity - 5.0; mood - 5.1.
It should be mentioned that when analyzing the functional state, not only the values of its individual indicators are important, but also their ratio. The fact is that in a rested person, the assessments of activity, mood and well-being are usually approximately equal. And as fatigue increases, the ratio between them changes due to a relative decrease in well-being and activity compared to mood.
Test material:
| 1 | Feeling good | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feeling bad | 1 |
| 2 | Feel strong | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | I feel weak | 2 |
| 3 | Passive | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Active | 3 |
| 4 | Sedentary | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mobile | 4 |
| 5 | Cheerful | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sad | 5 |
| 6 | Good mood | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Bad mood | 6 |
| 7 | workable | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Broken | 7 |
| 8 | Full of strength | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Exhausted | 8 |
| 9 | Slow | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Fast | 9 |
| 10 | Inactive | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Active | 10 |
| 11 | Happy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Unhappy | 11 |
| 12 | Cheerful | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Gloomy | 12 |
| 13 | Tense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Relaxed | 13 |
| 14 | Healthy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sick | 14 |
| 15 | Indifferent | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Hooked on | 15 |
| 16 | Indifferent | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Excited | 16 |
| 17 | Enthusiastic | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sad | 17 |
| 18 | Glad | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sad | 18 |
| 19 | Rested | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Tired | 19 |
| 20 | Fresh | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Exhausted | 20 |
| 21 | Sleepy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Excited | 21 |
| 22 | Desire to rest | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | A desire to work | 22 |
| 23 | Calm | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | preoccupied | 23 |
| 24 | Optimistic | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Pessimistic | 24 |
| 25 | Hardy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | weary | 25 |
| 26 | Bouncy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sluggish | 26 |
| 27 | It's hard to think | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | It's easy to think | 27 |
| 28 | scattered | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Attentive | 28 |
| 29 | full of hope | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Disappointed | 29 |
| 30 | Pleased | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Dissatisfied | 30 |
Test key:
- Questions on well-being – 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26.
- Questions on activity – 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28.
- Questions on mood – 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30.
Processing and interpretation of test results:
When processing, the estimates of the respondents are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to unsatisfactory health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; following him index 2- for 2; index 1- for 3 points and so on index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points ( Attention: the poles of the scale are constantly changing).
Positive states always score high and negative states always score low. According to these "reduced" scores, the arithmetic mean is calculated both in general and separately for activity, well-being and mood. For example, the average grades for a sample of Moscow students are:
- well-being - 5.4;
- activity - 5.0;
- mood - 5.1.
When analyzing the functional state, not only the values of its individual indicators are important, but also their ratio. In a rested person, the assessments of activity, mood and well-being are usually approximately equal. As fatigue increases, the ratio between them changes due to a relative decrease well-being and activity compared with mood.
The SAN technique is a kind of state and mood questionnaires. Developed by V. A. Doskin, N. A. Lavrentyeva, V. B. Sharay, M. P. Miroshnikov in 1973. When developing the methodology, the authors proceeded from the fact that the three main components of the functional psycho-emotional state - well-being, activity and mood can be characterized by polar estimates, between which there is a continuum of intermediate values.
Well-being is a complex of subjective sensations that reflect the degree of physiological and psychological comfort of a person's state, the direction of thoughts, feelings, etc. Feeling well can be represented as some generalizing characteristic (poor/well feeling, cheerfulness, malaise, etc.), and can also be localized in relation to certain forms of sensation (feeling of discomfort in various parts of the body).
Activity - 1) a general characteristic of living beings, their own dynamics as a source of transformation or maintenance of vitally significant connections with environment, which has its own hierarchy: chemical, physical, nervous, mental activity, activity of consciousness, personality, group, society. Activity is built in accordance with the probabilistic forecasting of the development of events in the environment and the position of the organism in it; 2) one of the spheres of manifestation of temperament, which is determined by the intensity and volume of human interaction with physical and social environment. According to this parameter, a person can be inert, passive, calm, proactive, active or impetuous.
Mood - a relatively long, stable state of a person, which can be represented as: 1) emotional background (high, depressed), i.e. be an emotional reaction not to the immediate consequences of specific events, but to their significance for the subject in the context of general life plans, interests and expectations; 2) a clear identifiable state (boredom, sadness, melancholy, fear, enthusiasm, joy, delight, etc.). The mood, unlike feelings, is always directed to one or another object. The mood, being caused by a specific reason, a specific reason, is manifested in the features of a person's emotional response to influences of any nature.
Processing of results.
When processing the results of the study, the scores are recalculated into "raw" scores from 1 to 7 (the extreme severity of the negative pole of the pair is estimated at 1 point, and the extreme severity of the positive pole of the pair is 7). It should be taken into account that the poles of the scales are constantly changing.
Option 1. The points obtained are grouped according to the keys into three categories and the number of points for each of them is calculated.
Well-being: 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14.19, 20, 25, 26.
Activity: 3, 4, 9, 10, 15.16, 21, 22, 27, 28.
Mood: 5, 6.11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 24.29, 30.
The scores for each category are divided by 10.
Interpretation. The average score of the scale is 4. Scores greater than 4 points indicate a favorable condition of the subject. Scores below 4 points indicate an unfavorable condition of the subject. State scores in the range of 5.0-5.5 points indicate a normal state of the subject. that in the analysis of the functional state of the subject, not only the values of individual indicators of SAN are important, but also their ratio.
Option 2. The sum of points scored by the subjects on all 30 scales is divided by 30.
Interpretation.
1-3 points - a person who is in a bad mood
3.5-4.5 points - a person who is dominated by a changeable mood or a person who himself is not able to assess his mood as good or bad.
5-7 points - a person who is most often dominated by a good mood
Typical map of the SAN methodology
Instruction: “You are invited to describe your state at the moment, using a table consisting of 30 polar signs. In each pair, you must choose the characteristic that most accurately describes your condition and mark the number that corresponds to the degree (strength) of this characteristic.
| Feeling good | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Feeling bad | |
| Feel strong | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | I feel weak | |
| Passive | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Active | |
| Sedentary | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Mobile | |
| Cheerful | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Sad | |
| Good mood | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Bad mood | |
| workable | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Broken | |
| Full of strength | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Exhausted | |
| Slow | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Fast | |
| Inactive | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Active | |
| Happy | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Unhappy | |
| Cheerful | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Gloomy | |
| Tense | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Relaxed | |
| Healthy | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Sick | |
| Indifferent | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Hooked on | |
| Indifferent | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Excited | |
| Enthusiastic | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Sad | |
| Glad | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Sad | |
| Rested | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Tired | |
| Fresh | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Exhausted | |
| Sleepy | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Excited | |
| Desire to rest | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | A desire to work | |
| Calm | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | preoccupied | |
| Optimistic | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Pessimistic | |
| Hardy | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | weary | |
| Bouncy | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Sluggish | |
| It's hard to think | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | It's easy to think | |
| scattered | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Attentive | |
| full of hope | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Disappointed | |
| Pleased | 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 | Dissatisfied |
Chapter 4 learning activities in primary school(according to GEF)
The results of the study on the questionnaire "SAN"
Questionnaire SAN
This blank test is intended for the rapid assessment of well-being, activity and mood (the questionnaire is named after the first letters of these functional states).
The essence of assessment is that the subjects are asked to correlate their state with a number of signs on a multi-stage scale. This scale consists of indices (3 2 1 0 1 2 3) and is located between thirty pairs of words of opposite meaning, reflecting mobility, speed and rate of functions (activity), strength, health, fatigue (well-being), as well as characteristics of the emotional state ( mood). The subject must select and mark the number that most accurately reflects his condition at the time of the examination. The advantage of the technique is its repeatability, that is, it is permissible to repeatedly use the test with the same subject.
During processing, these figures are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to unsatisfactory health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; index 2 following it - for 2; index 1 - for 3 points and so on until index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points (note that the scale poles are constantly changing).
So, positive states always score high, and negative states always score low. According to these "reduced" scores, the arithmetic mean is calculated both in general and separately for activity, well-being and mood. For example, the average scores for a sample of Moscow students are: well-being - 5.4; activity - 5.0; mood - 5.1.
It should be mentioned that when analyzing the functional state, not only the values of its individual indicators are important, but also their ratio. The fact is that in a rested person, the assessments of activity, mood and well-being are usually approximately equal. And as fatigue increases, the ratio between them changes due to a relative decrease in well-being and activity compared to mood.
Results up to pilot study scale "well-being"
As can be seen in the diagram (Fig. 1), there are no special differences in the dynamics of well-being before the start of the experiment. From this we can conclude that all three groups of subjects are in equal conditions before the start of the experiment.
The results of the pre-experimental study of the "Activity" scale
In general, activity (Fig. 2) is on the same level, except for the fact that they slightly outperform middle group, which will take a course of training on the "Key". Again, it is clearly seen that all three groups are in the same conditions before the start of the experiment.
The results of the pre-experimental study of the scale "Mood"
On the “Mood” scale, it can be seen that in the control group, the background of mood (Fig. 3) is slightly elevated, relative to the “key” and “AT” groups. This can be explained by the influence of factors external environment, or the presence of any irritant.
The results of the study group "AT" Table 1
|
test subject |
Feeling good 1 |
Feeling good 2 |
Activity 1 |
Activity 2 |
Mood 1 |
Mood 2 |
Activity (Figure 5) also increased compared to pre-experimental measurements. This can be explained by the fact that the head of the MOB has changed, and this could play a role.
|
Setup1 & Setup2 |
||||
The mood (Fig. 6) of the group after the classes improved significantly. Group cohesion tendencies are observed. The quarrelsomeness of the team has decreased, tolerance towards each other is observed.
Group results KEY. table 2
|
Feeling good 1 |
Feeling good 2 |
Activity 1 |
Activity 2 |
Mood 1 |
Mood 2 |
|
The results of an experimental study of the scale "Well-being"
It is clearly seen (Fig. 8) that from an average activity of 3.8 before the experiment, the activity after the classes increased to 5.6.
The results of an experimental study of the scale "Mood"
|
Setup1 & Setup2 |
||||
The mood (Fig. 9) also has a positive trend from 4.0 to 5.3 after the classes, the group trained according to the "Key" system has a higher dynamics of positive changes than the group trained according to the "AT" method
Test "SAN Questionnaire (well-being, activity, mood)"
Together with the Spielberger test, we conducted a SAN test (Health, activity, mood) for a better understanding of the causes of anxiety in high school students. These types of tests are often performed together (independently of each other) to better understand the occurrence of increased situational anxiety.
The essence of assessment is that the subjects are asked to correlate their state with a number of signs on a multi-stage scale. This scale consists of indices (3 2 1 0 1 2 3) and is located between thirty pairs of words of opposite meaning, reflecting mobility, speed and rate of functions (activity), strength, health, fatigue (well-being), as well as characteristics of the emotional state ( mood). The subject must select and mark the number that most accurately reflects his condition at the time of the examination. The advantage of the technique is its repeatability, that is, it is permissible to repeatedly use the test with the same subject.
When processing the results, all of the above indices are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to poor health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; index 2 following it - for 2; index 1 - for 3 points, and so on until index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points (it must be taken into account that the scale poles are constantly changing).
So, positive states always score high, and negative states always score low. According to such "translated" scores, the arithmetic mean is calculated both in general and separately for activity, well-being and mood.
It should be mentioned that when analyzing the functional state, not only the values of its individual indicators are important, but also their ratio. The fact is that in a rested person, the assessments of activity, mood and well-being are usually approximately equal. And as fatigue increases, the ratio between them changes due to a relative decrease in well-being and activity compared to mood.
Table 2.
|
Feeling good |
Feeling bad |
||||||||
|
Feel strong |
I feel weak |
||||||||
|
Passive |
Active |
||||||||
|
Sedentary |
Mobile |
||||||||
|
sad |
|||||||||
|
Good mood |
Bad mood |
||||||||
|
workable |
Broken |
||||||||
|
Full of strength |
Exhausted |
||||||||
|
Slow |
|||||||||
|
Inactive |
Active |
||||||||
|
Happy |
Unhappy |
||||||||
|
Cheerful |
|||||||||
|
Tense |
Relaxed |
||||||||
|
Healthy |
|||||||||
|
Indifferent |
Hooked on |
||||||||
|
Indifferent |
Excited |
||||||||
|
Enthusiastic |
|||||||||
|
Glad |
Sad |
||||||||
|
Rested |
Tired |
||||||||
|
Exhausted |
|||||||||
|
Sleepy |
Excited |
||||||||
|
Desire to rest |
A desire to work |
||||||||
|
Calm |
preoccupied |
||||||||
|
Optimistic |
Pessimistic |
||||||||
|
Hardy |
weary |
||||||||
|
It's hard to think |
It's easy to think |
||||||||
|
scattered |
Attentive |
||||||||
|
full of hope |
Disappointed |
||||||||
|
Pleased |
Dissatisfied |
Test key:
Questions for well-being - 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26.
Activity questions - 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28.
Mood questions - 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30.
Processing and interpretation of test results:
When processing, the respondents' scores are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to unsatisfactory health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; index 2 following it - for 2; index 1 - for 3 points and so on until index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points (attention: the scale poles are constantly changing).
During the SAN test, the following results were obtained:
Table 3
|
Anastasia B. |
||||
|
Polina P. |
||||
|
Natalya S. |
||||
|
Vitaly Ch. |
||||
|
Eugene Sh. |
||||
|
Tatyana S. |
The average score of the scale is 4. Scores greater than 4 points indicate a favorable condition of the subject, scores below 4 indicate the opposite. Estimates of the normal state lie in the range of 5.0-5.5 points.
Based on the SAN test conducted with students of gymnasium No. 2 in the city of Murmansk, it can be concluded that students in grade 10 "A" are generally in a favorable condition.
The test is intended for rapid assessment well-being, activity and sentiments(the questionnaire is named after the first letters of these functional states).
Subjects are asked to correlate their condition with a number of signs on a multi-stage scale. The scale consists of indices (3 2 1 0 1 2 3) and is located between thirty pairs of words of the opposite meaning, reflecting mobility, speed and rate of functions (activity), strength, health, fatigue (well-being), as well as characteristics of the emotional state (mood). ). The subject must select and mark the number that most accurately reflects his condition at the time of the examination.
test material
| 1. Feeling good | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feeling bad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2. Feel strong | I feel weak | |||||||
| 3. Passive | Active | |||||||
| 4. Sedentary | Mobile | |||||||
| 5. Cheerful | Sad | |||||||
| 6. Good mood | Bad mood | |||||||
| 7. Workable | Broken | |||||||
| 8. Full of strength | Exhausted | |||||||
| 9. Slow | Fast | |||||||
| 10. Inactive | Active | |||||||
| 11. Happy | Unhappy | |||||||
| 12. Cheerful | Gloomy | |||||||
| 13. Tense | Relaxed | |||||||
| 14. Healthy | Sick | |||||||
| 15. Indifferent | Hooked on | |||||||
| 16. Indifferent | Excited | |||||||
| 17. Enthusiastic | Sad | |||||||
| 18. Joyful | Sad | |||||||
| 19. Rested | Tired | |||||||
| 20. Fresh | Exhausted | |||||||
| 21. Sleepy | Excited | |||||||
| 22. Desire to rest | A desire to work | |||||||
| 23. Calm | preoccupied | |||||||
| 24. Optimistic | Pessimistic | |||||||
| 25. Hardy | weary | |||||||
| 26. Cheerful | Sluggish | |||||||
| 27. It's hard to think | It's easy to think | |||||||
| 28. Scattered | Attentive | |||||||
| 29. Full of hope | Disappointed | |||||||
| 30. Satisfied | Dissatisfied |
Key to the test
- Questions on well-being – 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26.
- Questions on activity – 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28.
- Questions on mood – 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30.
Processing and interpretation of test results
When processing, the estimates of the respondents are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to unsatisfactory health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; following him index 2- for 2; index 1- for 3 points and so on index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points ( Attention: the poles of the scale are constantly changing).
Positive states always score high and negative states always score low. According to these "reduced" scores, the arithmetic mean is calculated both in general and separately for activity, well-being and mood. For example, the average grades for a sample of Moscow students are:
- well-being - 5.4;
- activity - 5.0;
- mood - 5.1.
When analyzing the functional state, not only the values of its individual indicators are important, but also their ratio. In a rested person, the assessments of activity, mood and well-being are usually approximately equal. As fatigue increases, the ratio between them changes due to a relative decrease well-being and activity compared with mood.
Sources
- Test of differentiated self-assessment of the functional state/ Doskin V.A., Lavrentieva N.A., Miroshnikov M.P., Sharay V.B. // Questions of psychology. - 1973, - No. 6. - P.141-145.